

News Archive
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
Annoying Your Customers? Avoid These Brand Turn-Offs
April 8, 2010, 3:35 pm
Branding is a sometimes-elusive concept in marketing. We all know we want to build consumers’ like, trust and respect for our brands, but there isn’t a set way to do that. It’s hard to quantify progress in branding (unless you’ve got the moolah to spend on large, brand-specific surveys). But a new Harris Poll may help us avoid negative branding tactics—to an extent. The bottom line: be careful who you choose as your spokesman.
Case in point: me and Local Company. I’m not sure what brand message LC is trying to portray in their commercials, screaming “WE LOVE YOU!!!” at the end of poorly made, increasingly obnoxious, obviously local spots. Probably that they may be clinically insane. (If you really loved me, you’d never make another commercial.) When I came across their ad on Facebook this week, I hit the little gray X in the corner of the ad, and gave FB the reason of “This company is so freakin’ annoying.” The Harris poll shows I’m not the only one who would do the same thing.
35% of Americans have chosen not to purchase a product because they found the company’s ads distasteful, and another 28% just because the spokesman was obnoxious (another 22% thought about each of those). 27% chose not to purchase because they didn’t like a brand-sponsored program or event.
The results held steady across most ages, although those over 55 were slightly more likely not to buy for those reasons. Men and women were roughly equal in not buying because of distasteful ads, but men were more likely to not buy for the other two reasons. Interestingly, distasteful ads were as much as turn off for 18-34 year olds as for 55+s.
Harris also found some correlation with income level and tendency not to buy because of annoying spokesman—a third of those making $75k+/yr chose not to buy for that reason, while a quarter of those making $35k or less a year gave the same reason. (The in-between range was in between: 28%.) Education level also showed some correlation: 29% of those with a HS diploma or less chose not to buy because they found the ads distasteful, while 43% of college grads gave the same reasoning.
|
Why People Choose NOT To Purchase Certain Brands (Education and Income; % of Category Saying "Ever Done So”) |
||||||||
|
|
|
Education |
Household Income |
|||||
|
|
Total |
HS orless |
Some college |
College grad |
< $35k |
$35k- |
$50k- |
$75k+ |
|
I found the advertisements distasteful. |
35 |
29 |
37 |
43 |
36 |
30 |
35 |
39 |
|
I didn't like the spokesperson it used. |
28 |
23 |
31 |
33 |
25 |
25 |
28 |
33 |
|
I did not like a program or event sponsored by the brand. |
27 |
24 |
27 |
33 |
28 |
22 |
26 |
30 |
|
Source: Harris Poll, March 2010 |
||||||||
What do you think? Have you decided not to purchase something because of its ads?
Photo by daves cupboard






