Should you apply this principle to your activities as a webmaster or blogger? I’m not totally sure that I can give a positive answer to this question. But I’m going to save my objections for last. Now I’m going to show you a few situations when you might consider doing some make-believing, if you really must.
When could you fake it till you make it?
The biggest disadvantage of faking it till making it
Ethical issues are the number one reason why you should be extremely careful when you pretend to be more successful than you really are.
Do you like to be misled? Of course not. Why should your visitors like it then?
Even if you don’t care much for ethics, keep in mind that you can always be unmasked. I myself have written an article containing basic tips to help people measure a site or blog’s success. Anyone can read that article because it’s available for free. There are certainly other articles like that on the Internet. People are getting smarter and smarter anyway.
Are you willing to risk your reputation just to make some quick money?
]]>1. After writing my recent article on StumbleUpon traffic, I took the time to review it and compare it to the sources of information it was based on. I thanked myself for doing this: I quickly spotted some inaccuracies in my post. All I had to do afterwards was to correct the wrong bits of info, rebuild some sentences and add a few others. Of course, I took these simples measures before hitting the “publish” button. Then I reread everything again and compared the fixed article to my sources one more time. I only published the post after making sure that there wasn’t a single piece of info in it that I couldn’t claim to be true to the best of my knowledge.
2. Last week I started an article on a linkbuilding technique that looked great in theory. I had read about it on other blogs and decided to write about it too. Luckily, I had also decided to try the trick myself and see if/how it worked before writing the definitive version of my post. Now I’m glad I did it: my test showed me that the technique just didn’t work. Had I simply repeated what I had read on other places, now I’d be hating myself for having published a valueless article (and I’d have to deal with all the negative comments that the smartest readers would certainly leave).
Now can you see what’s the best way to preserve a site’s credibility?
I’m sure that by now you have realised it. But it can never be stressed enough, so I’m going to write it down: never ever publish inaccurate, flawed information on your blogs or sites. Not consciously, at least. We all make mistakes, but try to spot yours before you make your pages publicly available. Review all your material once again after it’s published and be ready to fix everything if need be.
In case you really can’t spot any flaws and still your visitors point out inaccuracies on your pages, edit them. And include your sincere apologies to your audience, emphasasing that you had written all in good faith and never meant to mislead anyone.
In sum: be honest, be humble, don’t be lazy. This is how you will sustain your site’s credibility.
]]>