

News Archive
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
Coming to an Ad Near You: Visit Us on Facebook
March 1, 2010, 12:56 pm
Maybe you’ve already seen them: the ads that end with “Visit us on Facebook,” instead of a URL. Reminiscent of ads a few years ago that encouraged us to search on a specific search engine with a specific keyword (or use AOL) instead of visiting a website, the latest rash of CTAs scream “look at us, we’re really hip!” Steve Rubel’s March column on Forbes (available on his blog) points out Uniball as one example of these newly hip-cool advertisers.
Yeah. Totally buying that. Not.
Even better, the Uniball Facebook page is giving away 10,000 pens (or was, anyway)—with no direct links to its website. While that’s a great social strategy (although . . . pens? You’re using digital marketing to give away pens?!), divorcing their social campaigns from their website—a space they wholly own and control—doesn’t seem like the smartest move.
Rubel points out that this try-hard social method will backfire with more savvy consumers (like me
. But seriously, see above reaction). He also says that (emphasis added):
Second, the use of “heavy artillery” – e.g. advertising – to round up more fans and followers is equally controversial. This would be fine if it lead to true person-to-person engagement. However, many brands are just using their Twitter and Facebook presences to spew out updates, without any thought to how consumers will benefit by essentially opting in. UniBall is providing value but others don’t go to such lengths.
Rubel also says that these social hubs are place that these companies are renting, without using them effectively. It takes people to create person-to-person engagement, and these corporate Facebook presences are, for the most part, “devoid of humans – e.g. employees – and many look like faceless companies that are trying to check off boxes or slap shiny logos on their site.”
That’s kind of the opposite of the point of social media, right? Using social media as a company gives you a chance to build your brand through authentic interactions. Looking fake != authentic, oddly enough.
And then it comes down to intent. If you want to give away 10,000 pens, that’s awesome. I have nothing against Uniball pens, and it does look like they’re at least making an effort in the social space. But if you want people to be able to learn about your products, shouldn’t there be some way to access that information from the call-to-action? Do we want to force people to guess at your URL or resort to a search engine to find you? What do you think?
Pilgrim’s Partners: SponsoredReviews.com – Bloggers earn cash, Advertisers build buzz!





