

News Archive
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
Danny Sullivan Suggests Google Needs Scrutiny
November 20, 2007, 9:58 amHis Search Engine Land post, an open letter to Orrin Hatch and Herb Kohl, Senators serving on the antitrust subcommittee, suggested alternatives to probing the privacy and competitive aspects of the deal. There are bigger issues with Google to consider.
"Why not investigate whether Google is trampling laws by both being a leading traffic source for some web sites while also being their leading revenue generator?" he asked.
To bolster this position, Danny cited commentary he made in April 2007 about Google's continued focus on "closing the loop," a scenario where Google earns money and insights into online activity no matter what people do on the Internet. He cited an example where he sought clarification of how data from Google Checkout might be used internally:
Both Chris Sherman and I asked when briefed if conversion and purchasing data would be restricted to only Google Checkout's use rather than for Google as a whole to use.We won't trot out the "is Google evil" tropes, because Danny has already done this well. We also picked up on what seemed to be the real tipping point moment in July 2007, when a Google blogger recommended ads for the health industry to counter the negative publicity of Michael Moore's movie, "Sicko."I repeated the question several times, in various ways, to ensure that Google was clear. And it was. If it found this data useful for something, it was going to use it however it wanted, for whatever it wanted. Nothing would be ruled out. It was a dramatic shift in attitude from a company I'd watched for so long.
As far as privacy goes, Danny thinks Google and its search competitors have the means to be privacy monsters, if they opted to do so. Though he half-jokingly suggested it's time to break up Google, it may not be impossible to think of Google occupying space in front of Judge Colleen Kollar-Kotelly once she is finished with Microsoft's antitrust oversight.




