

News Archive
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
Facebook Press Conference and Zuckerberg’s Thoughts on Privacy
May 26, 2010, 2:25 pm
Mark Zuckerberg and other Facebook heavies stepped up today to address their new privacy controls. This happens a day before they take the message to DC in a less than public forum. I suspect that’s where the real magic will happen which is what this is all really about: keeping Facebook off the radar of government and private sector groups who think that ‘Facebook privacy’ is an oxymoron.
On the Facebook blog, Zuckerberg tells in the first paragraph
When we started Facebook, we built it around a few simple ideas. People want to share and stay connected with their friends and the people around them. When you have control over what you share, you want to share more. When you share more, the world becomes more open and connected.
It’s the whole ‘people around them’ that keeps cropping up in all the Facebook-speak about privacy that makes people wonder whether this is really the end of the privacy ordeal or just another deft maneuver to avoid losing significant revenue opportunities.
He continues:
Finally and perhaps most importantly, I am pleased to say that with these changes the overhaul of Facebook’s privacy model is complete. If you find these changes helpful, then we plan to keep this privacy framework for a long time. That means you won’t need to worry about changes. (Believe me, we’re probably happier about this than you are.)
If there was ever a TBD in the social media space this is it.
As for the press conference? ZDNet reports
The key points from the Facebook press conference:
• Zuckerberg said the company’s changes were a reflection that Facebook listens.
• However, he noted that a lot of the privacy hubbub was overblown based on user data—the News Feed feature caused a much larger backlash. In fact, more people were worried about Facebook charging money than privacy.
• But Zuckerberg said Facebook’s privacy changes were designed to put the flap to bed for a while. Settings today will apply to new features in the future.
• “We’re really going to try not to have another backlash,” said Zuckerberg.
While there is a lot more to this than just a few clips here and there the one that I find the most interesting is the following from the blog post.
On a personal note, I just turned 26 years old a few days ago. I started Facebook when I was 19 and it’s amazing to look back at how it has evolved. There have been a lot of changes over the years as we’ve continued to innovate, and I appreciate that you have all stuck with us. Each time we make a change we try to learn from past lessons, and each time we make new mistakes too. We are far from perfect, but we always try our hardest to build the best service for you and for the world. So I just want to say thanks.
I don’t know about the rest of you but this ‘boy wunderkind’ reminder is played out. I don’t care how young he is or was during any of this, do you? It feels like an attempt to make this privacy mishaps just a function of youthful (fill in the blank). Because he’s just an “Aw, shucks!” young guy is just not even close to pertinent anymore. It’s done. This is big business and when any company plays fast and loose with people’s privacy there are no real excuses that will work anymore. Just stop screwing up and everyone will be happy.
Your take?






