

News Archive
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
Google Staying out of FCC Broadband Fight (But They’re on the FCC’s Side)
April 28, 2010, 12:30 pm
Earlier this month, the FCC lost a major battle when the US Court of Appeals decided they didn’t have the authority to regulate broadband. While the FCC can continue to appeal that decision, they’re also striving to get the definition of their authority expanded to explicitly include broadband.
And Google has no comment. On the definition issue, anyway. They’re all ready to pipe up on the central issue of the Comcast/FCC case—Net Neutrality. And they’re ready to speak up in the form of comments made to the FCC (i.e. not an amicus brief to a court):
We continue to believe that the FCC has ample legal authority to adopt broadband openness rules. In our initial comments, we explained that we agreed with the FCC that Title I of the Act appears to provide such a legal foundation for its proposed rules, and indeed for the FCC’s just-launched National Broadband Plan.
*cough*cough*suck*up*cough*
With the FCC trying to defend Net Neutrality, it’s little wonder Google wants them to win. In a non-neutral net, it’s possible that Google would face high fees from all ISPs to allow users to access the most popular site on the Internet. (Of course, conversely, ISPs might charge the users directly for accessing popular sites, or even just sites that don’t pay the ISP’s access fees. And remember that you can’t tax businesses—if Google has to pay fees to ISPs, do you really think they’re just going to eat those fees, or will they-of-the-thousand-free-products find a way to pass that cost along to users?)
Meanwhile, it’s also little wonder Google’s looking for any common ground they can find with the federal government as the search giant faces ever-increasing scrutiny of its actions from bodies including the FCC and the DOJ.
What do you think? Is Google just sucking up? Will their comments help the FCC’s case—or Google’s case with other regulatory agencies?
Pilgrim’s Partners: SponsoredReviews.com – Bloggers earn cash, Advertisers build buzz!





