

News Archive
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
Is PageRank Affected by Google Links?
September 2, 2009, 4:30 pmIn the latest Google Webmaster Central YouTube Channel upload from Matt Cutts, he talks about whether or not Google places value on its own links with regards to Pagerank. Cutts took on the following user question:
Question: Does Google value its own links for PR/Linkjuice? Google Bookmarks, Google Profiles, etc. Reason - Google links never appear in Webmaster Tools.
Have you had similar questions about Google sites and PageRank? Comment.
Google has plenty of products that spawn links, so the question is certainly a legitimate one. You've got Google Bookmarks, Google Profiles, Google Knol, YouTube, Blogger, and many others. Matt doesn't go through each product and specify Google's practices for each one, but he gives a general explanation about Google's policies regarding links from Google-owned sites.
Cutts says he doesn't know about whether Google links never appear in Webmaster Tools, but in general, people hold Google to a very high standard. He gives the example that if Google delivers search results that aren't blocked by robots.txt, people find out about it and draw a lot of attention to it, whether that be by blogging or forums, or whatever.
"We try to be relatively careful," says Cutts.
With search results, Google tries to make sure they're properties aren't too spammable, and if they are worried that something might be potentially abused, they will often use a nofollow attribute.
Cutts says with Google Knol for example, most of the external links started out as nofollow, but then over time as they learned which Knol authors were more trustworthy, they lifted the nofollow on those Knol authors.

Google Knol has not received a whole lot of media attention since it was launched in late December 2007. It is a site where users can write articles on any number of topics that they feel they are experts on. An article is referred to as a knol, which Google defines as "a unit of knowledge."
"Sometimes we do flow pagerank, but we try to be relatively careful because we're mindful of the people who do try to abuse it," he says.
The video is below in case you'd rather hear it straight from Matt's mouth, but I think I've pretty much covered what he says in the above text. That said, it is only a minute and a half, so it won't take too long to watch.
Google has a lot of properties, and this might not answer everybody's questions on the subject, but I would bet that the trust factor mentioned with regards to Google Knol, could probably be applied to other products.
Did you find Matt's response to the question useful? Share your thoughts.




