

News Archive
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
No Blogger Fines Yet, But FTC Has Its Eyes Out
April 29, 2010, 1:17 pm
The FTC created quite a stir last year when they announced their new blogging guidelines to crack down on bloggers who receive products free in exchange for mentions or reviews. The FTC reassured bloggers that the rumored $11,000 fines wouldn’t affect them, and that these guidelines were intended to target advertisers and big time bloggers who were practically making a living on the freebies alone.
Ooooor not. In what appears to be the first test case of the new guidelines, the FTC targeted Ann Taylor Loft—over $10 gift cards distributed to bloggers after a preview in January. Well, more accurately, gift cards worth up to $500, distributed after Ann Taylor reviewed the bloggers’ posts. (I believe the conclusion we can jump to here is that the cards or their amounts were directly related to how positive the review was.) As Econsultancy points out, this is “in direct violation of the FTC’s new disclosure rules.”
(Does $10 buy anything at Ann Taylor Loft? A bracelet?)
Ann Taylor Loft, according to the FTC, is responsible for ensuring the bloggers disclosed the relationship. However, there are no fines handed out this time. AdAge says:
The FTC said it decided not to take action against Ann Taylor, because, according to the company, the January preview was the first and, to date, only such event. Also, only a small number of bloggers posted content about the preview and several of those disclosed the gifts. A sign posted at the event directed bloggers to disclose the gifts, though the FTC says it’s not clear how many bloggers saw the sign. Finally, Ann Taylor’s Loft division adopted a written policy regarding its interaction with bloggers in February [after the event].
And, says Econsultancy, “LOFT adopted a written policy . . . stating that LOFT will not issue any gift to any blogger without first telling the blogger that the blogger must disclose the gift in his or her blog.” So short of making an announcement during the preview, Ann Taylor did work very hard to try to follow the FTC guidelines. So the first test case may not be very eventful—but the door is open. The FTC has long noted that the severity of their reaction will depend on the product itself. A $25 hardback isn’t going to draw the same censure as a $25,000 automobile.
What do you think? Who came out on top: the FTC or Ann Taylor Loft?






